<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dastardly Duty may be Demolished</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talktax.co.nz/index.php/2010/06/24/gift-duty-abolition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talktax.co.nz/index.php/2010/06/24/gift-duty-abolition/</link>
	<description>A Blog for Tax and Accountancy professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:28:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.talktax.co.nz/index.php/2010/06/24/gift-duty-abolition/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktax.co.nz/?p=753#comment-187</guid>
		<description>And there may be relationship property issues. The gifting program during a relationship has been argued as an asset so if there is no gifting the asset may be safe. However given the Courts  recent decisions regarding Trusts being ineffective to protect assets the situation may already be covered so that even if all assets are gifted away the retention of any degree of control over the trust assets (bundle of rights doctrine) will still render them liable to attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there may be relationship property issues. The gifting program during a relationship has been argued as an asset so if there is no gifting the asset may be safe. However given the Courts  recent decisions regarding Trusts being ineffective to protect assets the situation may already be covered so that even if all assets are gifted away the retention of any degree of control over the trust assets (bundle of rights doctrine) will still render them liable to attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Israel Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.talktax.co.nz/index.php/2010/06/24/gift-duty-abolition/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Israel Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktax.co.nz/?p=753#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, that would make NZ quite the tax haven, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, that would make NZ quite the tax haven, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

