Accounting standards left trying to fix tax oddity

In May 2010 the Taxation (Budget Measures) Act 2010 did away with tax deductions for depreciation on buildings with an expected life of 50 years or more. That in itself had many taxpayers and their advisors shaking their heads in dismay. However, imagine the impact it has on companies with large property portfolios. This latest amendment to the tax law has resulted in many companies having a deferred tax liability.

The effect of these deferred tax liabilities is that companies’ accounts may not reflect a “true and fair view” and may be misleading for investors because even though it affects the net profit, it does not have any relevance to the performance of the company per se.

It is now up to the local Financial Reporting Standards Board (FRSB) to sort this situation out. Due to the fact that the IFRS are exactly that – an international standard – an amendment to the international rules is required so that New Zealand remains aligned with the international standard.

Georgina Bond sets the situation out nicely in her article in The National Business Review (August 27, 2010, at p. 12). What I find telling is that apparently government was aware of the reporting issues that would arise, as you’d expect it to be, when drafting the legislation but has left it up to the FRSB to find a solution. So be on the look out for changes to the accounting standards sometime in future.

No Responses

Be the first to leave a comment!

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Recent comments

  • Simon G: Both of my parents are in residential care which is being paid for by their residential care loan. In the...
  • Carla Cross: I agree with you entirely. Transparency and certainty are crucial for a self-assessment tax system....
  • Daniel Hunt: It depends on the reason for the shareholding change. What is your reason for changing the shareholding...
  • Viny: Just wondering if we can change shareholding if we are moving to LTC from LAQC or whether this will seen as...
  • Robynne Sutton: My Father is currently being assessed (since May!) Stephen I think you mean “are not limited...
  • Paul: We find the write up, comments, questions and answers very useful. Based on below we have some queries: LAQC...
  • Elizabeth Mitchell: On 4th September, 2011, Daniel Hunt published an article in the Herald on Sunday titled...
  • Sandra: Very nice info. Was looking forward to the reply you had for Anne, but it is sent to her by email. Any...
  • Lynda: My husband and I own a LAQC since 2004 which we are looking at putting on the market in the next few months....
  • Daniel: The Supreme Court has been busy – two Avoidance Judgments in a week (Penny & Hooper & JG...

Poll

In the past 12 months, do you think the amount of IRD investigations being undertaken has?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...