TalkTax

…and so the battle continues between a tax “genius” and the IRD. Since the 1980s, Mr J G Russell (Mr Russell) has been involved in legal disputes with the IRD over various schemes designed to reduce liability for income tax on companies he consulted to. The IRD claims that he owes millions of dollars in back taxes, which has since grown, with penalties and interest, to a whopping $138m. Read more

In recent times, we have seen several tax cases being lost by Taxpayers. Analysing the judgments, I believe we have seen a fundamental move when dealing with tax avoidance – a move back towards statutory interpretation. The Newton and Elmiger cases are the policy basis for our anti-avoidance rule as they focus on statutory interpretation and I believe the courts are showing a move back to this ordinary approach (as can be seen in the Banks cases).

Read more

A word of encouragement before you discontinue your investment LAQC or make any voluntary disclosures to the IRD – make sure you consult your accountant or tax advisor and consider all the relevant facts.

It appears there has been something of an irrational and hasty response to IRD’s Revenue Alert (www.ird.govt.nz/technical-tax/revenue-alerts/revenue-alert-ra0701.html) and related information advising of IRD’s investigation into personal homes being sold to LAQC’s.

Read more

Fancy a free book…? Post an article or comment on a posting on TalkTax in September and you could win one of two copies of James Coleman’s new book ‘Tax Avoidance Law in New Zealand’…

Tax Avoidance